JCE Online Journal of Chemical Education
 | Subscriptions  | Software Orders  | Support  | Contributors  | Advertisers  | 



  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 1998  > May  >
Chemical Education Today
Commentary
Deducing the Shell Model from Ionization Energies and the Use of Models in Introductory Chemistry
Ronald J. Gillespie, Richard S. Moog, and James N. Spencer
Franklin and Marshall College, Department of Chemistry, Lancaster, PA 17604-3003

Cover
May 1998
Vol. 75 No. 5
p. 539

Abstract
A major objection of Rioux and DeKock (1) is the statement in our earlier paper (2) that electron repulsion is responsible for the relative ionization energies of H and He. Their work clearly shows that a quantum mechanical treatment of this problem reveals that kinetic energy considerations play a crucial role in these values. However, although their criticism is appropriate in the context of this more sophisticated QM treatment, it does not in any way invalidate our original paper, the goal of which was to provide a model, namely the shell model, for the electronic structure of atoms that is consistent with experimental ionization energies. For this purpose it is not even necessary to discuss the difference in the ionization energies of H and He because it is only the large decrease in the first ionization energy from He to Li, indicating that the third electron in Li is at a much larger distance from the nucleus than are the electrons in He, that is relevant to deducing the shell model. Still, students often ask "Why is the ionization energy of He not twice that of H?" Within this simple shell model, it would only be twice that of He if the electrons were the same distance from the nucleus as the single electron in H and if there were no repulsion between the two electrons. Repulsion between the two electrons in He would reduce the ionization energy of He to less than twice that of H. This is what was intended by the last sentence of the paragraph quoted by Rioux and DeKock: "The ionization energy of helium is slightly less than twice the ionization energy of hydrogen because of the repulsion between the two electrons in helium" (2).
More Information
*  Citation
Gillespie, Ronald J.; Moog, Richard S.; Spencer, James N. J. Chem. Educ. 1998 75 539.
*  Keywords
*  History
Created:
Last Updated:
June 23, 1999
June 23, 2005
  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 1998 > May > Page 539



Chemistry Teacher Connection

The "Chemistry Teacher Connection" (CTC) is especially for high school chemistry teachers. For only $40/year, it offers an online-only subscription to CLIC along with membership in the Division of Chemical Education, normally $65/year. CTC subscribers receive access to all articles and supplements from 1996 through the current issue.


C&EN CLICs

Through special arrangement with the ACS, JCE High School CLIC is now able to provide subscribers with online access to Chemical & Engineering News articles that have been selected specifically for secondary science instructors and their students. 


JCE Collections Available
Occasionally, collections of JCE back issues become available for donation to individual teachers, schools, or libraries. JCE matches collections with interested recipients. Recipients pay shipping costs or pick up the collection.

Contributions Welcome
JCE welcomes your submission

Subscriptions

Fishing for New Ideas
Always in the
process of
improving, CLIC
welcomes ideas and comments.

Email Us

NSF logoDivCHEDACS ACS PubsFor journals in other fields of chemistry visit ACS Publications.