Using the method of standard additions, two different methods of estimating the standard deviation and associated confidence interval for the concentration of an analyte are quoted in commonly used textbooks. It is shown, numerically and algebraically, that a method using the law of propagation of errors invariably gives lower values for the standard deviation than a second technique, which uses extrapolation. On examining the statistical reasoning used in the law of propagation of errors method, it is found that certain covariance terms are assumed to be negligible. Only when combining variables that are truly independent is this assumption valid, which is not the case in standard additions analysis. Consequently the equation used in the extrapolation method is recommended in estimating the standard deviation and confidence interval.
More Information
Citation
Bruce, Graham R.; Gill, Paramjit S. J. Chem. Educ.1999, 76, 805.
Our Secondary School editors work hard to distill all the JCE materials to produce a fraction of particular interest to high school teachers. We call it CLIC.
In recent years we have worked hard to better match our advertisers with our readers. When shopping for chemistry education materials, visit our advertisers' WWW sites first.
Take JCE along on your outreach missions. Copies of the Journal, guest access to JCE Online, our publications catalog, and more are available for your participants.