Do novice science learners have naive but coherent theories about the world or do they have only fragmented, disconnected ideas about science concepts? This is the crux of the debate currently being fought out among cognitive scientists. This paper briefly reviews that debate and then shows how both the 'knowledge in pieces' ideas of Andrea diSessa and the concept of naive theories can be applied to chemistry instruction. Data from two recent studies of learners' ideas about bonding and the nature of matter are also presented as illustrations of both naive theories and diSessa's ideas.
More Information
Citation
Nakhleh, Mary B. J. Chem. Educ.2001 78 1107.
Keywords
CER Learning Theories; CER Misconceptions; Chemical Education Research; Teaching/Learning Theory/Practice
Our Secondary School editors work hard to distill all the JCE materials to produce a fraction of particular interest to high school teachers. We call it CLIC.
In recent years we have worked hard to better match our advertisers with our readers. When shopping for chemistry education materials, visit our advertisers' WWW sites first.
Take JCE along on your outreach missions. Copies of the Journal, guest access to JCE Online, our publications catalog, and more are available for your participants.