JCE Online Journal of Chemical EducationDivision of Chemical Education, American Chemical SocietyAmerican Chemical Society
 | Subscriptions  | Software Orders  | Support  | Contributors  | Advertisers  | 

JCE Print
   Current Issue
 Previous Issues
 Supplements
 Search JCE Index

JCE Digital Library
   ChemInfo
 DigiDemos
 Featured Molecules
 LivTexts
 LrnCom
 QBank
 SymMath
 WebWare

JCE Software
   Latest Releases
 Software & Video
 Downloads
 Support

Only@JCE Online
   JCE Online Store
 JCE HS CLIC
 JCE Discussion Forums
   Biographical Snapshots
 ChemEd Resource Shelf
 Featured Molecules
 Hal's Picks
 Project Chemlab
 Reviewed WWW Sites
 "Web-Ed" Articles

About JCE
   Features
 Publications
 Operations
 Outreach
 Contact Us


  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2007  > May  >
Research: Science and Education
Chemical Education Research
"Concept Learning versus Problem Solving": Does Particle Motion Have an Effect?
Michael J. Sanger, Eddie Campbell, Jeremy Felker, and Charles Spencer
Department of Chemistry, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN 37132
Cover
May 2007
Vol. 84 No. 5
p. 875
Abstract
A sample of 210 students was asked to answer a static particulate-level multiple-choice question concerning gas properties first used by Nurrenbern and Pickering. Then they viewed an animated version of the question and answered the multiple-choice question again. They were also asked to explain whether any of the particle motions differed from their expectations and how they decided which option was correct. Although the distribution of student responses for the static question was similar to previous reports, the distribution changed significantly after students viewed the animation. After viewing the animation, more students chose the correct answer, fewer students chose each incorrect option, and more students changed their choices to the correct answer than to an incorrect option. The authors attribute the effectiveness of the animated question to the fact that it addresses the threats to validity previously identified for the static question. The major impact of the animation appears to be in minimizing the difficulty students have in visualizing the particle motions for each distractor. The animated question also helped students distinguish between one distractor that depicts a gas whose volume had decreased and another distractor that depicts a gas that had been liquefied or solidified.
More Information
*
Citation
Sanger, Michael J.; Campbell, Eddie; Felker, Jeremy; Spencer, Charles. J. Chem. Educ. 2007, 84, 875.
*
Keywords
Chemical Education Research; First-Year Undergraduate / General; Gases; High School / Introductory Chemistry; Kinetic-Molecular Theory; Multimedia-Based Learning; Phases / Phase Transitions / Diagrams; Qualitative Analysis; Quantitative Analysis
*
History
Created:
Last Updated:
3/22/2007
4/6/2007
<< Previous Article Table of Contents Next Article >>
  Home > JCE Print > Journal of Chemical Education > Issues > 2007  > May  > Page 875


Subscriptions
 Subscription Info
 Order Forms

JCE HS CLIC

Our Secondary School editors work hard to distill all the JCE materials to produce a fraction of particular interest to high school teachers. We call it CLIC.
 JCE HS CLIC

Contributions Welcome
JCE welcomes your submission
 Contributors' Corner

Advertisers
In recent years we have worked hard to better match our advertisers with our readers. When shopping for chemistry education materials, visit our advertisers' WWW sites first.
 Recent Advertisers

Be An Ambassador
Take JCE along on your outreach missions. Copies of the Journal, guest access to JCE Online, our publications catalog, and more are available for your participants.
 Outreach with JCE

Comments to
jceonline@chem.wisc.edu		 Copyright © Division of Chemical Education, Inc., American Chemical Society.
All rights reserved.